| ▲ | fluidcruft 16 hours ago |
| Destroyed evidence of what? |
|
| ▲ | gruez 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Destroyed materials that might be relevant to an investigation that you know exists. |
| |
| ▲ | morkalork 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Hmmmm sounds like the government can launch endless bs investigations, wait for their target to throw something (anything, a piece of paper, whatever) in the trash then charge them with destruction of evidence. A infinite guilty-change glitch if you will. | | |
| ▲ | gruez 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That's what judges are for, so cute hacks like "putting everyone in the US under "investigation" won't work. That said, if I was under investigation, you bet your ass I'd be extra diligent in ensuring I'm not accidentally shredding any documents. | |
| ▲ | nearbuy 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What you're describing is malicious prosecution or abuse of process. It's illegal and it would destroy the prosecution's case. Not only that, but the victim could sue for damages. | | |
| ▲ | tantalor an hour ago | parent [-] | | Sort of like deliberately targeting somebody for his alleged association with the movement against Cop City? |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | grey413 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| To quote the article: suspected terrorism activities because of his alleged association with the movement against Cop City Complete horseshit on many levels, but presumably a legally valid investigation. |
| |
