> I'm not delivering features at 10x the speed. There's a limit to the amount of code I can (and should) be submitting for review.

My point exactly

> But the features I'm building are _better_, and the effort is less.

Can we cash that check or is it gonna trade heavily discounted like all grand claims on AI since all software all around us together with the economy and the Earth's life supporting systems keep degrading every year? We keep getting promised the better, but we only get to see the more.

▲

brindleth a day ago | parent [-]

> My point exactly

No it wasn't. You said the claims were only based on quantity. I'm saying the opposite. I deliver the same quantity, with higher quality.

> Can we cash that check or is it gonna trade heavily discounted like all grand claims on AI since all software all around us together with the economy and the Earth's life supporting systems keep degrading every year?

I'm not sure what evidence I could offer you that would ever convince you. We've had strong coding models for less than a year, and you've already appear to have closed your mind about them and wrapped them up into your depression.

	▲	flogistonical 12 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Saying "nuh uh" after I pointed out something that is plain to see isn't much of an argument. Show us better than? Where is the unequivocally better software, or anything really, "AI" enabled you to do? Or is it just claims that amount to "trust me" or "look at all these repos/web apps"?
	▲	skydhash a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Someone that describes programming like that is strongly suspect IMO. > I'm not wasting mental bandwidth typing out a dozen React components full of the same-old state management, form processing code, etc. Why haven't you abstracted that away already? Like building a UI library. > I'm not trawling through charting library docs, looking for the precise combination of settings to make my chart's x-axis ticks labels rotate 45 degrees. There's a method to actually read library docs to find what you need. This seems like someone complaining about the effort to do research with a book, but forgot to use the table of contents and the index and instead starts on page 1. > My mental energy is focussed on figuring out what solution is actually _right_, not the minutiae of how to persuade the computer to do it. You don't persuade a computer, you just translate the solution that is right. That's what coding is, merely translating. And to do that well, you need to know both languages: The domain and the computer platform. If you don't know the computer platform, you can't translate an idea. It would be like trying to speak French without knowing French. Yes you can try with Google Translate, but machine translated texts can be quite horrible to the native speaker. Same with using AI to generate code.