IMO any contract, waver, etc., shouldn't be legally enforceable unless the signatory has actually read it. It's always seemed to me to be one hell of a pathway of abuse (in a way) to just be able to bind someone to be legally required to do anything you want, for example, by just relying on them not reading the thing they signed.

▲

dotancohen an hour ago | parent [-]

How to know if they actually read it? The signature implies that the contract has been read, understood, and accepted. I see no need for any alternative mechanism.

	▲	inigyou an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Well for instance if the other party is pressuring you to sign it then it can't be assumed that you had adequate time to read it and understand it