| ▲ | avree a day ago | |||||||
Surely writing 374 lbs is easier than 26st 10lb. | ||||||||
| ▲ | tredre3 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
And 1.125lbs is easier to write than 1 pound 2 ounces, yet Americans will look at you with a blank stare if you don't use ounces. When it comes to units, you can't please everybody. Especially if it's tangentially related to the old colonies. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | julianlam a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
What an Americentric point of view. Not everybody measures weight in pounds, and to the primary readership of the BBC, stones and kilograms mean much more than weighing pounds. Source: Canadian who understands neither kg or stones. | ||||||||
| ▲ | release-object a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
The 2nd number immediately means something to me. While I have to consider the first. From my perspective it isn’t easier to comprehend. An unrelated point. I’ve noticed more people in the UK measuring their weight in KG. I think I may be in a dwindling minority of people who think in stones and pounds. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | pfannkuchen a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Isn’t stones/pounds just like feet/inches? Do you support dropping feet and only using inches? If not, why not? | ||||||||
| ▲ | Fire-Dragon-DoL a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I have no clue, give me kg thanks. | ||||||||