> For example, one operator’s price-comparison site listed a package that bought the equivalent of $3,333 worth of official Anthropic credit for 425 RMB — roughly $0.13 of usage per $1 spent.

Do these numbers make sense? $0.13 usage per $1 spent?

▲

zaltekk 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think this was very poorly worded. I believe they’re trying to say you pay the reseller $0.13 to get what costs $1 at the upstream provider.

▲

mmoskal 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Also 425 RMB is about $59 so $1 of tokens for $0.017 not $0.13 (the discount rate quoted also seems off).

	▲	kristjansson 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		seems like they missed a zero somewhere. its a dollar of usage for a penny and change.

▲

mlenhard 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, I should probably clean this up. The sentence is a bit hard to understand. What I was trying to show was the steep discounts offered by resellers.

▲

jagged-chisel 4 hours ago | parent [-]

So $1 of usage for $0.13?

	▲	SyneRyder an hour ago \| parent [-]
		That sounds entirely plausible. When I was on the Claude Max $100 plan, I would often get the equivalent of at least $1300 API usage, according to the costs counter in Claude Code. That would be about $1 of usage for every $0.075c. At $1 of usage for $0.13, the reseller is making a tidy profit on top of whatever subscriptions they're reselling.

▲

latchkey 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you are using a stolen credit card to buy tokens and resell them, then the cost per token is the amount the credit card cost you (and building/running the proxy service), not the value of the tokens themselves.