It hardly ever the other way around. Its no secret that Islamists are responsible for most of the terror attacks in Germany and Europe, and here you are justifying terrorists. There is a reason why China does what it does ;-)

▲

khaledh 4 hours ago | parent [-]

That's factually false.

US CSIS data says attacks by non-Islamists account for 85% of total attacks, while attacks by Islamists is just 15%.

In Europe, Europol TE-SAT data says it's 59% by non-Islamists vs. 41% by Islamists.

Also, I'm not justifying this attack. I'm pointing out the double-standards.

	▲	indiangenz an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		So much lies. You guys never for once accept responsibility. This is exactly why China went with re-education. And 41 % according to your claimed figures (which is incorrect) with < 10% of population? Thats actually arguing against your own claims.
	▲	GenerocUsername 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Now do per capita and see that their rate of terror is 10x what it should be. (And that's before readjusting for the undercategorized events being purposefully NOT counted for cultural sympethies)
	▲	throwawaypath 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		>US CSIS data says attacks by non-Islamists account for 85% of total attacks, while attacks by Islamists is just 15%. "What is per capita?"
	▲	x3ro 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		There is an additional aspect to these statistics. Eg a guy set fire to a house last year in Germany, killing four people of turkish descent. They found plenty of nazi paraphernalia in his house, but it was concluded that there was no “right-wing extremist motivation”. So there is a big question of skewed statistics underpinning all of these discussions.