> one option is an escalation with NATO.

Wouldn't this make the situation much worse for Russia, and therefore for him as well? The oligarchs will know who is to blame if Putin starts a war with NATO.

▲

8note an hour ago | parent | next [-]

war with nato means he can more easily convince the russian public to go along with mobilization

russians arent excited to go die in ukraine, but defending the homeland from NATO is a different story

▲

cbg0 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The oligarchs aren't the ones controlling Putin, it's the other way around. But yes, escalation with NATO is a very poor idea, given Russia's struggles with a single non-NATO country.

	▲	GTP 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I belive it's the other way around only up to a point. If the situation gets too bad, I believe they have the resources to overthrow him.

▲

miohtama 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Regime security for Putin in an escalation/mass mobilisation situation is high. The chances of the Russian economy surviving are poor.

▲

WJW 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Often economic crisis leads to less regime security, not more. Why would it be different in Russia?

	▲	miohtama 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Watch the video in the link and it is quite well explained there.