| ▲ | Grombobulous 2 days ago | |||||||
The Steam Deck numbers are shocking but I wonder about the methodology of those. Valve was sold out of the Steam Deck for a long time, so I’d expect their sales to have been very low. They also talked about difficulty sourcing parts for the Steam Machine at any price. I definitely subscribe to the idea that some device categories really do turn from an impulse buy thing into making zero sense for most people at some price. Stuff like a steam deck or an iPad are going to be the most sensitive to that. I own an iPad that is literally useless to me outside of reading/printing recipes in the kitchen or watching videos on. The device can certainly do more than that but it’s just not what the form factor makes sense for in my life. I paid something like $300-400 for a refurbished previous model iPad Air. If that device turned out completely useless that wasn’t a big loss. Same deal with the Steam Deck: at $350 it’s worth taking a chance on even if it ends up collecting dust. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rchaud 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Consumer demand is much more price-sensitive than enterprise demand, not least because the latter can issue bonds to pay for RAM and GPUs. Prices for consumers are going up everywhere: food, gas, insurance, you name it. Steam Deck and Nintendo Switch have a competitor that's the elephant in the room: Chinese Android handhelds that run rings around them on price and play everything from NES to Switch games locally as well as PS5/Steam via remote link. | ||||||||
| ||||||||