| ▲ | cogman10 an hour ago | |||||||
These cameras aren't just invasive, they are expensive. Cities are paying a pretty penny to access a few web cams. Last I looked it up, $2500 per year per camera in the surveillance area. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dagurp an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
They are also installed improperly https://www.wate.com/news/tennessee/flock-cameras-tennessee-... | ||||||||
| ▲ | hamandcheese an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
That doesn't sound expensive to me. Not compared to, say, a $1.7M public toilet[0]. To be clear, I do not support Flock cameras. [0]: https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/san-francisco/san-fran... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||