> Managers get aggregate level view of code quality

What's the measure of code quality in this case?

tysilva 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It really does feel like leaders in large organizations are lost on the valuable metrics when it comes to code in general. The mantra seems to often be, make number go higher - regardless of if it's valuable data or not.

▲

kandros a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If quality is the metric, nobody would use something like that, seems like a micromanagement tool

▲

larsien a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Agree, it is the most important part

	▲	tdu01 a day ago \| parent [-]
		My team is hyper productive with Cursor, using different models for different tasks. My senior engineers approve PRs, but it's not humanly possible and is demoralising to review the amount and rate of code being churned. Sure there are a lot of automated tests. We struggle with a measure for code quality that scales. We mitigate by having small releases and running A/B instances but I still lose sleep over pace vs quality.