| ▲ | afavour an hour ago | |||||||||||||
What are you asking that you’re so regularly running into censorship? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | alain_gilbert 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
The other day, I told claude that my physical wifi door unlock push buttons is a security risk because someone could run away with it and then unlock the door from outside whenever he wants. Then I told it that I want to introduce a concept of public/private key to uniquely identify my push buttons so that I can disable them individually using some crypto like ed25519... Fable understood it as something along the lines of: "introducing" "security risk" "using software" to "unlock door" YOU ARE FLAGGED | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gck1 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Reverse engineering. Codex sometimes displays an advisory prompt when classifier trips - "Wait longer while we evaluate this request further or use a dumber model". If you do nothing, it'll just take some time and almost always succeed. It does require some brainwashing of the model to get it to the state where model itself agrees to do RE work though. But at least it's all predictable. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wild_egg an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I'm doing a bunch of x86_64 assembly these days and Fable is simply not allowed to debug it. Hoping Opus 5 has a bit more freedom. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Levitz 4 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I routinely get into blocks when running medicine-related material through it. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wewtyflakes an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I've hit it with intensely benign things; like asking it to make me a web-based client-side word game. I am guessing it saw the dictionary and pattern matched on various words, though ultimately it provided no explanation for why it triggered safeguards. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | patcon 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Working on dimensionl reduction algorithms, I hit it all the time. I'm also trying to port related protocols from single-cell transcriptomics to collective intelligence systems (working with people x reaction matrices as analogous to single-cells cell x gene matrices. Something between single-cell work and advanced nonlinear DR methods (perhaps used in alignment work?) it always flags me | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | weird-eye-issue 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Literally anything related to nutrition, athletic performance, etc especially if you ask it for research or sources | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | msp26 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Asking fable to read it's own model card triggers this btw. Or asking if mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | icedrift an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
If you even broach language related to biology you’ll get rerouted. I was presenting data in a grid and referred to a grid cell, Fable saw the word “cell” and safeguards kicked in | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | arcanemachiner 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I was profiling a slow machine the other day, and triggered the safeguards. I've been saying this a lot lately, but it doesn't bites you until it bites you. The more you use the clanker as a general purpose fix-it tool (goodbye manual NeoVim configuration, you will not be missed!), the more you will find yourself bumping into these safeguards. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thousand_nights an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
i do homebrewing and asked it to compare some beer yeasts for me and hit the safeguards because... biology i guess lol | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cute_boi 26 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Just ask math question and it will censor that. Even Misanthrophic employee confirmed that. | ||||||||||||||