| ▲ | torginus 2 hours ago | |
The product strategy of 'consumer-grade' AI making deliberately insecure software, and then selling you limited access to the model that can fix it (if they think you deserve to pay them) is just diabolical. (Grade 3 AI which can hack both previous tiers is exclusively sold to the highest bidder.) | ||
| ▲ | novaleaf an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
I don't think it's nefarious, but the end result leads to a pretty frustrating experience by anybody needing actual security work. (and without the organizational deep pockets to obtain SOC 2 attestation) | ||
| ▲ | mathisfun123 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
how many tinfoil hats do you own? | ||
| ▲ | realusername an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> AI making deliberately insecure software, and then selling you limited access to the model that can fix it (if they think you deserve to pay them) is just diabolical. It's also not a very good marketing strategy, secure software and quality also goes in pair and it just makes me doubt about the output of Fable/Sol | ||