| ▲ | deet 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
I compared the writing style of Opus 5 vs Fable 5, and Opus 5 continues many of the "Claude-isms" of its 4.8 predecessor in a way that Fable broke away from. Opus 5 still uses "carry the argument", "worth stating plainly", ", and the trap", "The X matters more", the use of "move" We need an "annoying English" benchmark. - Fable 5 Max: https://gist.github.com/deet/3d97f854b48eac6658d642fa18bb24d... - Opus 5 Max: https://gist.github.com/deet/1a43693a732dfccb4d0d914bfc42692... | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | DonsDiscountGas 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think a signature Claude style of writing is good since it makes it that much harder to pass off Claude written text as human. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Kwpolska an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Fable might be using those phrases less, but its writing is still terrible and exhausting to read. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | winwang an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I found 4.6 more amenable than 4.8 to style directions, we'll see how 5.0 does. Super-small-sample-size: I think part of its "Claude-ism" style comes from its propensity to try and "proactively" move the conversation/work along. Not sure how this would fare in non-obviously-productive environments, I'd guess "it's still annoying" considering your evidence. I'm also thinking of another benchmark: (quantified) stylistic range across different prompts. Just putting it out there if anyone wants to do the work for me :D | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ianberdin 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I’m pretty sure Opus 5 is adapted to tricks from long reasoning in Kimi K3 and based on original Opus 4.8. It is not fable in any form. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||