No we are not living in future. Design is ugly, and immediate put off because it smells AI.

FranzFerdiNaN an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Reading your comment I had to think of that tweet about someone taking a part of a Monet painting and claimed it was AI generated, and people immediately started calling it horrible and soulless and smelling like AI.

	▲	bonoboTP 20 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Obviously. Artistic value is not in the object, but in the relationships to other humans. The point is not Monet but the people you discuss Monet with. Monet is a tribal rallying point you can synchronize around. AI is not as good for this, because it's cheap. It's not scarce enough. And doesn't offer a human story you can bond around.
	▲	aaa_aaa an hour ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Well this is no Monet for sure.
	▲	newsy-combi 30 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Humans are capable of producing slop too. Maybe the cutout does look like AI. Given Monet's blurry style and repetitive content (he made 250 water lily paintings), this is not surprising. When you strip the cutout of its context, it can look more like AI too because the lighting and composition will look arbitraty compared to the whole picture. Btw, if websites would only include the frontend dev's own hand painted images, we would also revolt at the sight of human slop. It's not just AI. The whole point is that good artists are capable of producing non-slop, and to this day they're the only group of which this is reliably true.

▲

HaZeust an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Then tell it that, and it'll give you the output you desire.