Let's be honest - they're also still hiring software devs. AI still requires skilled humans in the loop and that's not going away.

▲

arm32 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But the job itself may not exist in a year, according to the job posting page.

▲

SketchySeaBeast 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There should be a sign somewhere:

934 days since people first started threatening that devs would be replaced by AI in 365 days. 0 day(s) since Anthropic posted a developer job posting.

Only one of those numbers would need to be dynamic.

	▲	4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	subscribed 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		In my long and quite happy and successful career in the adjacent field none of the actually good jobs were the posted. Specialist headhunters handle that.

▲

moonu 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm pretty sure that was a fake screenshot made as a joke, not an actual job posting

▲

arm32 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Nah, it's real. I very clearly remember going to their site, with TLS enabled, and reading it myself. I see they've scrubbed it now though.

▲

DaSHacka 3 hours ago | parent [-]

If you have the link for the page handy, I'd be curious to find the original revision on the wayback machine. That's too funny, especially if they've silently walked it back since.

	▲	arm32 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I tried to find it on Wayback but their job page's SPA is broken on all relevant archives (roughly around March 2026). Maybe you'll have better luck.

▲

londons_explore 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It is going away for non tech companies though.

Imagine you are a company that sells concrete. You have a web dev contractor you use to build and maintain your website. It has tools on it to get delivery quotes and a few internal tools to track orders.

Except now you can just have your sales team also maintain the website with a $20/month Claude subscription.

	▲	atraac 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		They said the same about low code and no code when they appeared. That didn't happen. And it won't happen now too. Sales people, managers etc don't want to dabble in technical things and do not want the responsibility.
	▲	SketchySeaBeast 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		I don't know about Claude, but I know that $20 of Copilot doesn't get you very far these days even when you know enough to tell it what to do.
	▲	dawnerd 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		They might try that for a bit but then come crawling to an agency because their setup turned to slop. We have some clients like that already. Going to be a pretty big market.

▲

teaearlgraycold 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's funny how they are at a disadvantage because they feel obligated to AI-max. Would Claude Code, as an interface, be as mediocre if they had software engineers writing its code directly? I doubt. On the other hand - how embarrassing would it be if they sold you a tool to write code but they were careful not to use it too much on their own products?

	▲	igregoryca 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I suspect many competent devs in the industry would find it sensible if Anthropic used their products as light-touch "assistants" sometimes. But yeah, it wouldn't fit the outside narrative that's formed and conveniently propped up valuations.