Rather interesting that this makes sonnet 5 look even worse! There is no reason to use sonnet over opus with low or no reasoning at all.

▲

plqbfbv 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I daily drive Sonnet 5/medium because it gets most things right most of the time at first try, while costing a lot less than Fable.

Opus can give better results on architectural/concept tasks and I use it sparingly, but it still costs more than Sonnet 5. Opus 5 seems to achieve results very close to Fable 5 while costing less (keeps Opus 4.8 pricing IIUC), but still more than Sonnet 5 then.

▲

krmmalik 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

My understanding is that Opus should be used for planning, macro-level conversations and Sonnet for execution.

So, for coding, for example: Opus for solution design and architectural blueprint and then Sonnet for actual implementation.

Works out cheaper with minimal loss of quality.

At least that's my personal understanding and anecdotal experience.

	▲	theLiminator 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It depends on your quality bar. At a fixed level of quality, given a high reasoning sonnet vs a low reasoning opus, the low reasoning opus tends to be pareto optimal. It's only when you need even lower levels of cost than opus at zero to low reasoning when sonnet starts to make sense at all.