> It can choose to be a smaller community with a stronger political identity, but that is a different ambition from being a broad and dependable European alternative to GitHub.

Wrong category. It doesn't want to. It's not a company. Might as well act on their beliefs.

Devs are so spoiled with free CI, running nonsensical workflows all the time for free. Imagine that multiplied by magnitudes thanks to AI. Just a waste of resources.

▲

pelasaco 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Devs are so spoiled. They first tried to sell themselves as morally better than GitHub, and now the spoiled devs ban who uses AI..

▲

krupan 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Spoiled with freedom of association and freedom of speech

▲

lowsong 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Banning AI does make them morally better than GitHub yes.

▲

skinfaxi 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Without additional explanation this reads like flamebait.

▲

lowsong 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Flippant maybe, but not bait.

AI is many things, and a moral choice is one of them. Codeberg's stance isn't a moral one as much as a technical one, but there is a very strong argument that the use of AI is inherently immoral.

	▲	skeledrew 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> there is a very strong argument that the use of AI is inherently immoral Do say more.
	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]