| ▲ | ambicapter 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 stages feels like a lot of added complexity for your first launch. I assume it gives you more performance margin to drop weight/stages more often? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | MobiusHorizons 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 stages is certainly a lot more than most rockets, but most rockets don’t use solid rocket stages. Solid rocket motors are generally much more reliable/ simpler than liquid fueled stages, but they can’t be throttled or turned off early which makes it hard to achieve precise orbits. My guess is the extra stages allow for better control by carefully choosing when to light the next stage. The scout family of rockets are also 4 stage solid rockets and probably a good comparison. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | walrus01 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It's three solid rocket boosters stacked on top of each other and a very tiny liquid fueled engine on the 4th stage. I would be interested in what the delta/v stats/capability of the 4th stage booster are with 350 kg payload. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wat10000 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A partially empty stage wastes mass on propellant tanks sized for the full load. The mathematical ideal would be an infinite number of infinitesimally small stages. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||