Essentially, think of it as Netflix for which you provide the media yourself. A browser is one possible way to connect, but clients exist too (e.g. a Roku app and so on). Having the ability to connect with a client running on something connected to your TV is nice, as is the ability to connect remotely (if you open up the ports on your firewall of course). It also gives you things like remembering what shows you were watching and giving a shortcut to the next episode, intro skipping, transcoding, and so on.

Nope. I still don't get it. (Maybe because I'm too old for this stuff?)

> think of it as Netflix for which you provide the media yourself.

Netflix is a provider of content. If I have the content, why do I need a provider for?

> Having the ability to connect with a client running on something connected to your TV is nice

(???) But that's what I'm doing now with Kodi.

> as is the ability to connect remotely (if you open up the ports on your firewall of course).

Wireguard (only one port), and all home LAN is accessible, not just one service.

> It also gives you things like remembering what shows you were watching and giving a shortcut to the next episode

Kodi does that too. Or maybe you mean it remembers between player devices? See ep.1 on player A and it shows up as seen when I start player B too? That's nice. I think I read somewhere that Kodi can use a remote MySQL/MariaDB for it's library too. I could probably set up a shared DB.

> intro skipping

How does it know where the intro is and how long?

> transcoding

If I were to install Plex/Jellyfin it would be where the storage is - on a router that also serves as a NAS. It doesn't have the power to transcode anything, not even audio. Meanwhile, the lowest spec phone can play everything. So, why would anyone transcode in 2026?