| ▲ | smallmancontrov a day ago | |||||||
The tax advantages of being forced to pay ordinary income rates on your distributions as compared to long term capital gains (which are low, capped, can be exercised before a tax hike, and avoided entirely if you just need collateral)? | ||||||||
| ▲ | Retric a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||
401k reduces your taxable income when depositing money, this is more tax efficient than paying normal income taxes and then also paying capital gains. 401k lets you rebalance a portfolio with zero tax implications. The downsides are generally high fees and a 10% penalty for early withdrawal which makes them surprisingly bad for young people. They tend to start in lower tax brackets, have fewer reserves when unemployed, and face fewer risks from an unbalanced portfolio. Pay down debt then Roth IRA when young 401k after 40 is often better than defaulting to a 401k, but saving anything tends to be more important than such optimizations. | ||||||||
| ||||||||