Is the OP the author of this? Because they are writing responses here that are unquestionably unedited LLM generated responses. The project looks cool, and I'm particularly glad to see a reach for a p2p container registry, but that sort of behavior doesn't lend credibility to something as critical as image infrastructure.

Unrelated: I clicked your user profile and wondered what that keybase.io thing was... turns out your proof expired and should no longer be trusted. :P

"That identity proof for <name> is pending, revoked, or non-existent".

It looks like OP only has an account here to self-promote, which also puts them in the same credibility tier as an advertiser.

I hate how I feel about this: the sole contributor's account is not 2 month old, and yet they have created an org for this project, with all the bells and whistles in the README.

To me, a project that young, with a unique developer at the helm, cannot look "that nice", so I can't resist seeing it as too nice to be true, and being actually a scam or whatever.

I know that, thanks to AI, a solo dev can not only orchestrate an actual projects in a few days, but can ALSO take time to make a good looking README.

When, in the past, the focus was first on the code, then on the README.