| ▲ | duzer65657 an hour ago | |||||||
most don't even have 3-5 years "spending money" (whatever that is) in total savings; if you're keeping that in cash you're getting 2-3% annually while the market has doubled. | ||||||||
| ▲ | MattGrommes 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
When you're headed into retirement, one possibility is to shift to saving more in cash-like options instead of a 401k (or whatever). It's should just be part of your retirement plan to account for possibilities like this. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rwmj an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Sure, but we're not talking about people who have no savings. FIRE people have huge investment portfolios while being frugal with their spending, and understand the risk of keeping 5-10% of their total net worth in cash equivalents (not dissimilar to having insurance). | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | hdgvhicv an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
People return with less than 4 years expenses in retirement funds Surely you need about 20 years? | ||||||||
| ▲ | bell-cot 30 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Look back at the grandparent comment. If someone doesn't have 3-5 years in total savings, then they had better not try to retire. | ||||||||