> They created a situation that they knew would end in a cybersecurity incident.

That's a conspiracy theory.

Yes. It is. And your theory is that there was no conspiracy. What makes yours more likely than mine? You believe the people running these companies are innately good and just wouldn't do that? Are we supposed to assume that they're incapable of bad actions until proven otherwise? If so, why?

	▲	simonw an hour ago \| parent [-]
		That's why I called it a "conspiracy theory". Sometimes those are true. In this case I think it's extremely unlikely to be true, because it involved an (almost certainly illegal) attack against another company. That company talked about that attack, including warning their customers about it, five days before OpenAI confessed it was them. So now either Hugging Face are in on the conspiracy, or OpenAI decided to break the law and antagonize a partner company just for the sake of a spicy blog post.