| ▲ | iamnothere 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Ah, ok. Is there a fallback for using bare keys instead of human readable names? If not, you have just recreated a central gatekeeper problem; you could be ordered to terminate name service for someone. Unless it’s using some decentralized crypto system like eth. Optional human readable names could be a good system combining convenience with resilience. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | aliasxneo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It's using a decentralized backend. No, it's not using any existing blockchain, nor does it have any tradable token. It does have some blockchain properties, but the main layer is built on top of libp2p. Agreed it's a very hard problem. We're in the process of forming a syndicate of like-minded parties who are interested in seeing this come to life because the model itself has no exit plan and is basically anathema to traditional capital funding. Also, to be clear, names are hashed/salted in the backend with Argon2ID and a rotating salt. So the name index itself isn't enumerable, but it doesn't necessarily guarantee names are private once they are shared publicly. Theoretically you could lookup someone based on their public key without knowing their name - so in that sense it's somewhat close to what you're describing. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||