| ▲ | Someone 3 hours ago | |
Not “30% fuel efficiency”, but an improvement of 30%. FTA: “The project aims to demonstrate up to 30% improved fuel efficiency for a typical 250-nautical-mile regional turboprop mission” | ||
| ▲ | c0n5pir4cy 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I was so confused by the title - I thought jets were fairly efficient at ~40%-50% of theoretical maximum and turbofans can't be that far behind. It would maybe make sense for a single prop aircraft. 30% improvement makes much more sense. | ||