For a more informed discussion about what's banned and what's not, I'm leaving here this discussion on Mastodon: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116962454004862117

TL;DR: AI assisted coding, when used responsibly, is not banned, however one-shotting something via vibe-coding and hosting it as a complete project, is.

Also, Codeberg always had a limit on private repositories and never wanted to be a place for non-FLOSS software. It's their mission. They are not out there to replace GitHub/GitLab.

▲

mcv 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That starting message is not encouraging:

> so many people who have made "coding with an LLM" their whole personality

As opposed to "coding without an LLM" being their whole personality? Neither of these are what a personality is. Comments like thesen are needlessly dismissive and not conducive to a healthy discussion.

Codeberg has every right to set their own standards, but the discussion around it is ugly and dismissive of many well-meaning developers.

▲

gs17 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> TL;DR: AI assisted coding, when used responsibly, is not banned, however one-shotting something via vibe-coding and hosting it as a complete project, is.

Doesn't seem to be what they put in their ToS:

>You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools

Unless you've defined "responsibly" in a funny way.

▲

ctoth 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> TL;DR: AI assisted coding, when used responsibly, is not banned, however one-shotting something via vibe-coding and hosting it as a complete project, is.

On Tuesday I was working on my Braille 'N Speak emulator[0], an ancient Z180-based accessible notetaker for the blind. I wanted a z180 emulation library that wasn't z180-emu (GPL) and that I could use on the web via wasm, on my phone, and would have a Python binding.

Of course, this is a perfect sort of job for an agent with a verification loop, so I went off and researched if there were any standard conformance suites for z80/z180. Turns out there are a ton! I wired up my verification loops, fired off /goal, and sat back. Now, I have my library[1].

Was "AI assisted coding" "used responsibly?"

Should this sort of thing be allowed? Why or why not?

[0]: https://github.com/ctoth/qns

[1]: https://github.com/ctoth/z-core

▲

invictati 15 hours ago | parent [-]

It's about control. It's always been about control. The moderators of this project would happily throw you under the bus if you ever in any way displeased them while being an AI user.

	▲	jasonvorhe 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I think this is the main drive behind this. Make it easier to get rid of people you don't like/don't welcome on your platform without making it explicit, because that could surface some biases of theirs.