Most people I know are delighted by these changes and the only people I've seen complain are the ones that let their unmonitored LLM(s) rum rampent.

It's interesting because the terms have repeatedly stated that using them isn't banned; they just don't want to be flooded with unmaintained slop.

> It's interesting because the terms have repeatedly stated that using them isn't banned

This is the relevant part in Codeberg's Terms of Use: [0]

> You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude, OpenAI Codex). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5).

The only ambiguous part is what "mostly" means in practice, but otherwise the Terms of Use is pretty clear. I'll admit that their blog post [1] is more inclusive and tries to clarify things but it's all just one very unnecessary drama [2].

[0] https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse...

[1] https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-...

[2] The proposal for this change was called "ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions" so you can tell that some people are very opinionated on this.

So you checked up on everyone critical of this decision in these comments, dug into their git history and confirmed that assumption?