| ▲ | notdefio 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Im less interested in the memory than the memory bandwidth. The current system with 128GB can load pretty big models, but its meaningless unless you want to wait 40 minutes per prompt. I've had best results with Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, which uses 40GB of memory, but only uses 3 billion parameters per token which helps with throughput. Until memory bandwidth significantly improves I just can't see myself wanting to use all that memory. Unless it's just to keep a wide variety of models in memory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gbuk2013 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I run Qwen3-Coder-Next-UD-Q4_K_XL and other than the initial wait to initialise context (which takes less than 2 minutes) subsequent prompts return in less than a minute, usually less than 30s. If your performance is significantly slower then you are probably doing it in CPU - there was some fiddling required to get it to use GPU (I use llama.cpp) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | andy99 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Try poolside that came out yesterday https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49004937 or Qwen 3.5 122B A10B, both use more memory and still have experts sized for decent speed at the 395’s memory bandwidth at 4bit quantization | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | eigenspace 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For those wondering, the AI Max 395 has around 256GB/s of memory bandwidth, whereas this new 495 has 273GB/s. So a very modest improvement in bandwidth. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | paxys 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If you are waiting 40 minutes for a prompt on a Ryzen max+ you have no idea what you are doing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cyanydeez 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I use exactly the setup you describe; it can handle 1-3 agents working if the agent work has IO delays. with MTP models, prefill is quite fast. Not sure what damage you have, but no one waits 40 minutes per prompt or even a minute; The A3B model loads within 10 seconds and a simple response in opencode is maybe at most a minute, then catches up in 3-5second bursts depending on IO. I put dynamic context pruning into opencode and tweaked it for 45k-85k context before it shrinks; this lets me get into 500k token sizes and fixed on medium sized github repos. There's a chance this comment is a skill error: 1. USe llamacpp with a MTP model 2. Use reasoning-budget and reasoning-message 3. Tailor your agent to use the reasoning-message to use subagents and dyanmic compaction. --- Now you have a reasonable coding agent for cloning, building and extending any github project I've seen so far. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cmrdporcupine 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I have an NVIDIA Spark thingy (the ASUS one) and it's the same problem there, though the prefill side is superior to the Ryzen ones. But I actually think 128GB is too little. There are some compelling models that are above what can fit in that at reasonable quants (e.g. DeepSeek V4 Flash) but could if the system was 256GB. If RAM prices weren't so f*cked I think we'd be seeing 256GB and even 512GB unified memory systems becoming quite common. As it is I think it will be 10 years before >128GB becomes feasible on a regular consumer machine for normal people again. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||