| ▲ | Schlagbohrer 11 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
"Worse on purpose" is just "Minimum viable product" | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | piyuv 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The definition of “viable” matters | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SideburnsOfDoom 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Not quite. "Getting worse" is discussing a mechanism where a product first has a good reputation, for good reasons. It's not "minimum viable". And then the company proceeds to exploit that reputation for all it's worth, by making the product cheaper to make, while keeping the sale price the same, knowing that it takes a long time for the reputation to catch up. But eventually it does and the brand is basically defunct. Used up and discarded, being drained of reputational value. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tweakimp 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The "minimum viable product" is part of the development process. If you are already at a certain quality and choose to make it worse, this is something else. Enshittification or just greed come to my mind. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Ker102 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Its because of monopolies | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hypercube33 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It's just crapitalism - make thing as cheap as possible and charge as much as possible. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||