| ▲ | wasfgwp 2 days ago | |||||||
> two wrongs don't make a right There is no second “wrong” here. Model outputs are not copyrightable. I think that was already established? Or do you think that Anthropic should own all the code generated by Claude? Surely that would be somewhat problematic? If Anthropic feels that some of their customers are breaking their EULA (nothing to do with copyright infringement though) they are free to stop doing business with them. Maybe even sue them in civil court for breach of contract (again nothing to do with copyright infringement though) | ||||||||
| ▲ | dijksterhuis 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
there's a difference between a moral wrong and a legal wrong. in a heavily simplified view, moral wrongs are usually decided in the eyes of the victims -- you did bad thing to me so i'm not going to talk to you anymore. legal wrongs are decided by courts -- you did a bad thing so this court has decided you're not allowed to talk to that person anymore. anthropic are essentially saying in this tweet they believe a moral wrong has been committed against them -- "unacceptable behaviour" etc. plenty of people have been vocal about the fact anthropic have committed moral wrongs at scale in building the products in the first place, with the question of legal wrongs still being worked out. so, two moral wrongs. legally, fuck knows. | ||||||||
| ||||||||