I don’t know how anyone with a neutral view can confidently take this:

> Direction: All 21 pelican-bicycle images, across all seven labs, face right. No other animal/vehicle combination does that.

> However, facing right is common: 60% of all 1,008 images do it…

and the tables in “Evidence #5” to be anything but evidence the models have likely trained on pelican on bicycle data more than others.

The data clearly shows:

- 100% pelican on bicycle facing right

- significant skew to the right for bicycle-like vehicles

- significant preference for right facing for birds

Averaging those extreme results to “60%” to make it sound like it’s pretty fair because it’s close to “50%” isn’t statistically sound.

The methodology is generally unsound. There is no actual scoring with a well defined rubric, it’s just vibed with a single model (GPT 5.6 Luna).

The “not better at drawing” evidence are equally hard to take seriously when there is no clear, non-subjective indication of what better or worse is.