He was a very readable columnist for PC Mag among other places. He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct.

>He was a hilarious curmudgeon.

Agreed.

▲

duzer65657 6 hours ago | parent [-]

>> He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct.

So exactly like everyone today, but also interesting?

▲

smackeyacky 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

He set the style of being confidently incorrect. At least he was entertaining.

	▲	smoyer 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		He would make a great AI!

▲

ghaff 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Probably. With some exceptions, he wasn't flat out wrong. But he did push the boundaries from time to time.