I think there are parallels here to software development.

When starting a brand new project it’s better to have a lot of human involvement to make sure the AI is creating a foundation that actually matches requirements, both spoken and unspoken. But once the project reaches maturity it’s more realistic to imagine an AI working on top of that concrete layer.

So goes management. Bootstrapping a new company? Needs human involvement. A company just ticking along? I’m less convinced. Or to be more specific, as a developer who is told my work is obsolete by CEOs, I’m interested to know why they don’t apply the same logic inwards.

▲

adamtaylor_13 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Is a company ever really just "ticking along" though? Seems to me like you're always sliding one way or the other, largely due to leadership at the top.

	▲	afavour an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Same goes for software development projects. I think the point of the satire is “why does it apply to X but not you?”

▲

andsoitis an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> A company just ticking along?

Environment around you changes all the time which means if a company wants to stay around it needs to be able to adapt at any moment.