Would love some kind of randomized A-B test where CEOs are replaced with AI and the outcome measured. Would not at all be surprised if it’s far better than the bottom quartile or more.

More practically, I think you could give a board of directors access to an LLM that sees all levels of company operations and let them talk to that chatbot as a stand-in for the CEO on a 24/7 basis.

▲

piguin 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

CEOs can definitely be "hacked" by scammers but I think the public will react differently when a large company puts a lot of control in the hands of AI and it is scammed with some kind of cognitive hack that people assume wouldn't work as well on expensive wetware.

	▲	hsuduebc2 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'm kinda curious how AI would cope with immoral or ammoral decisions and tactics used daily by competition and if itself would start to practice them.

▲

jascha_eng 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

tbh AI is great at vague strategic decision making with a low risk bias. I wouldn't mind working for Claude