| ▲ | veeti 4 hours ago |
| Once you look at how German anti-nuclear lobbying set Europe back decades on its energy independence and made us dependent on authoritarian hellholes of the world, it all makes sense. They just want to do the same with AI. |
|
| ▲ | andor 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It’s probably pointless to argue, but there was never a lot of nuclear power in Germany to begin with. This is just turning energy policy into culture war. |
| |
| ▲ | kalessin 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not a lot is inaccurate given the carbon intensity of coal and its importance in Germany's energy mix. Anyway, I think the nuclear debate is quite off-topic here. | |
| ▲ | veeti 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, when you spend decades arguing "nuclear bad" (or "AI bad"), it turns out you get left in the past as Jurassic Park. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | flohofwoe 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > user: veeti
> about: Just trolling.
Well, at least you're upfront about it ;) |
|
| ▲ | lionkor 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Open source code that is AI authored is worthless. If I need an LLM authored, idk, terminal emulator, I will simply ask my AI or use one of the tens of thousands out there. |
| |
| ▲ | veeti an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I use Linux every day, where AI coauthored analysis and code has already contributed to harden its security. Like it or not, any project that categorically rejects AI contributions or engages in vague activist type purity spiral testing over "vibe coding" seems like a security liability at best. | |
| ▲ | graemep 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It depends what you mean by "AI authored". If you mean one-shotted vide code, then yes. If you mean someone providing detailed instructions for architecture and functionality and reviewing the code, then it does have a lot of value. |
|
