| ▲ | walrus01 4 hours ago |
| Grey market residential proxy service providers are one of the most common methods of implementing bot spam, social media manipulation and plenty of straight-out fraud. There's all kinds of things that malicious actors want to do where they value coming from an ordinary (comcast, charter, centurylink, shaw cable, whatever) residential IP. |
|
| ▲ | cognitiveinline 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| You make a good point. I've reassessed and agree this is shady, and not a good pattern. And should be disabled/abolished. |
|
| ▲ | hokumguru 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I mean, some of us have legitimate business needs to get past cloudflares frankly somewhat bs gatekeeping business model, however |
| |
| ▲ | walrus01 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Sure, I do as well, I have my own VPN into my home office that lets me run traffic outbound through its default gateway while I'm somewhere else. But letting random third parties I don't know run traffic through my house is another thing entirely. | |
| ▲ | nikanj 30 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | To be clear, bot spam and social media manipulation are legitimate business needs for the business selling said services. | | |
| ▲ | JoshTriplett 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | | You can't have legitimate business needs if you're not a legitimate business in the first place. Ban them all. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | charcircuit 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Just because others abuse privacy doesn't mean that we should remove privacy from everyone else. They also let you get around geoblocking. |
| |
| ▲ | nvme0n1p1 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're free to let strangers download illegal images from a proxy running on your IP, but I sure as hell won't. | | |
| ▲ | charcircuit 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you don't want to share your internet with others, that is your choice, but please don't make seem like you are only sharing the internet with criminals. That is a harmful belief to spread. |
|
|