| ▲ | xethos a day ago |
| > the right to own firearms is very explicitly stated in our constitution The right to bear arms does not necessarily mean firearms. Arms doesn't necessarily even have to include firearms, and America is already pretty damn strict about certain armaments, such as sub-machine guns. Americans are allowed to have certain firearms, sometimes, in some places. I'm not sure how one squares that with the blanket statement from the American constitution that Americans have the right to bear arms, unless it's simply an impossibly poorly-informed citizenry |
|
| ▲ | kelnos 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| You can personally interpret the US constitution however you want, I suppose, but the only interpretation that matters is that of the Supreme Court. And they have held over and over that 2A includes a right to many different kinds of firearms. I feel like you're the one who is poorly informed? (For the record, I am in favor of strong gun control laws, but your statement just ignores reality.) |
|
| ▲ | modo_mario 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > and America is already pretty damn strict about certain armaments, such as sub-machine guns. Not one but you're really validating their slippery slope fears and claims there. |
|
| ▲ | redeeman 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| and this is very clearly unconstitutional. "shall not be infringed" is very very plain and simple |
| |
| ▲ | inigyou 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yep, alongside "Congress shall make no law" which says it's fine for anyone who isn't Congress to infringe your free speech, or for Congress to do it in any way that isn't making a law. | | |
| ▲ | WarmWash 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The system does not work like that, hah. This is the kind of logic sovereign citizens use..."I'm traveling, not driving, so I don't need a license!" At the end of the day, judges have the ability to clear away silly logic like that, it's part of their job. | |
| ▲ | redeeman 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | thats very very obviously not how it works or was intended. then they could just come up with "rules" that are not laws, and then rules say cannot have arms. all these insane and VERY OBVIOUS attempts to bypass the constitution should result in official doing it be put in jail FOREVER | | |
| |
| ▲ | myko 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The 2A was created for states to maintain their own troops, what is now the modern national guard - hence "well regulated militia" SCOTUS bastardized this original intent. It's shameful. | | |
| ▲ | giantg2 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | What you miss is that US Code defines militia as the explicit militia that you mention, but also the implicit militia. That implicit militia includes others not in the national guard. It's also worth mentioning that most states have similar language to the second amendment, including states whose constitutions were implemented prior to the bill of rights, lending to the credence that this is a right of the people, and not of the state. The 10th amendment was supposed to be for the rights of the states. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246 |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Spooky23 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The more… enthusiastic gun people among us think that the national firearms act (which strictly regulates automatic weapons) is an abomination. It’s unique in that it’s the only right that aligns with business marketing. Peddling fear, mostly to insecure men, has sold hundreds of millions of guns. The fetishized nature of modern gun culture killed, in addition to people, a lot of shooting sports and hunting. |
| |
| ▲ | deejaaymac 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | What a strange take. I grew up in a small hunting town (I'm in my early 30s), where most high school boys (most girls didn't hunt, but some did) had a rifle and/or shotgun in their truck, mounted against the inside back of the cab where you could see it plain view. We had 0 homicides from guns in the 19 years I lived there, there was 1 suicide by gun that I know of. Many of us grew up hunting to feed our family. This is in Colorado. I shot my first pistol around the age of 5. I accidentally went to 7th grade with ammo in my pocket because we were hunting that morning. I went to the principal, he told me just to put the ammo in my locker. With that being said, you'd be hard pressed to find a group of townspeople more respectful of guns. It's not a gun problem, it's a culture problem. Not saying that there's not "insecure men" out there that are the victim of marketing, etc, but a lot of us grew up with guns and see them as a tool. | | |
| ▲ | lesostep 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My mom grew up in a small town (village? settlement even?) like that (surrounded by nature, lots of hunting, animals can wonder in town) in a country where guns weren't free. Every family still had a rifle, getting license isn't that hard when you could answer questions about your intentions. No handguns though, not very useful for self-defense or wildlife. I believe mom made and shot her first arbalest around 6-7 yo though. Similar cultures, but one of them allows for outsiders to screen potential gun owners, and the other doesn't. Which, I believe, is the point – there always will be mentally unwell or ill-intentioned people. There should be a way for a small town to revoke the trust of allowing weapons in their hands. | |
| ▲ | Spooky23 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think we’re closer than you think. I grew up in a similar place - my school had a rifle and trap team. Great place to grow up. I’d often go out for the first they day turkey season and miss school. Reality is shooting sports licensing churns significantly and has for many years - the people doing it get older every year. Some of the stats look better becuase many states offer more deer tags to fewer hunters. There is a huge culture problem. Army LARPing and conspiracy move guns. Legal arbitrage makes the retail channel a haven for smuggling. Marketing lands heavily on that and politics. The sportsman (and often conservationist) is a relic notion. | |
| ▲ | antonvs 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > see them as a tool. Yes, a tool for killing. You’re respectful of guns, but where’s your respect for life? | | |
| ▲ | grosswait 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | Respectful of liberty. A spear is also a tool for killing. Respect for life is not an expectation of the tool. |
|
|
|
