| ▲ | pier25 7 hours ago | |||||||
This is not even than a slap on the wrist. Publishers who negotiated this really fucked up writers. According to US federal law, pirating a single copyrighted work and gaining commercial advantage of it (which Anthropic 100% did) represents five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. But it gets worse: "Penalties for a copyright infringement conviction may increase if the defendant has previous similar convictions, made more than 10 copies of copyrighted works, committed copyright infringement during a period longer than 180 days, or infringed copyrighted material worth more than $2,500." https://www.justia.com/entertainment-law/piracy-in-the-enter... | ||||||||
| ▲ | conradkay 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Those are the maximum penalties though It's seemingly $3,000 per book, so they could've (and did, partially) just bought the books themselves for way cheaper, and with only a fraction of that money going to the authors | ||||||||
| ▲ | paxys 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It's valid to not take AI companies' side here but people who think publishers are fighing for the little guy's rights are delusional. Tech companies have been exploiting artists for a few years, publishers/record labels/media companies have been doing it for centuries. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | consensus1 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
That is a false statement. Gaining commercial advantage means selling pirated copies which Anthropic absolutely did not do, so none of your following statements are correct either. | ||||||||