Because that was just an attack on Anthropic by a hostile administration. And it worked, didn’t it? Anthropic had to turn their filters up to absurd levels, OpenAI didn’t. It’s got nothing to do with safety.

▲

JumpCrisscross an hour ago | parent [-]

> It’s got nothing to do with safety

Doesn't change the effect. Plenty of good policy is enacted by self-interested politiicans.

▲

space_fountain 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

We'll see if the admin also restricts access to OpenAI's new models, but if they don't it seems like a policy that is based around perceived fealty to the current admin won't do much to prevent misaligned/or dual function AI from causing problems

▲

Avicebron an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Gatekeeping the public's access to models is "good policy" now? I suppose you think you'll get a dispensation to use Fable and Mythos?

▲

JumpCrisscross an hour ago | parent [-]

> Gatekeeping the public's access to models is "good policy" now?

Sorry, I was unclear. I mean that politicians being self serving doesn't tell you whether a policy is good or not.

▲

asdf88990 an hour ago | parent [-]

It almost always does, the few exceptions prove the role. Self-service is the antithesis of accountability to collective trust.

	▲	JumpCrisscross 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> Self-service is the antithesis of accountability to collective trust Complex society is a potent counterargument to this hypothesis. Systems that rely on good people to work are fundamentally flawed. Instead, the game has to be about aligning self interets in favour of the collective.