AI seems to have been involved in the targeting process, so partial truth.

There may have been outdated information which incorrectly associated the prior use of the site "as either a factory or arms depot". See Wikipedia:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Minab_school_attack#Analy...>

Citing "Iranian school was on U.S. target list, may have been mistaken as military site" (March 11, 2026) <https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/03/11/...>.

I'm not drawing conclusions one way or the other, but there do seem to have been multiple factors at play, and assigning full responsibility to use of AI seems suspect.

Which isn't the same as saying AI isn't at fault; e.g., an AI might challenge a dated assessment of a prospective target's role or status, as might a human-in-the-loop target assessment team and process.