| ▲ | blovescoffee 2 hours ago | |
1. it's not cheap to run glm-5.2 so not just anyone can do it 2. just because you haven't heard of attacks doesn't mean they haven't happened 3. this attack in the article was performed by a prerelease model which presumably benchmarks a bit above Sol which benchmarks above glm-5.2 We went from gpt 3 to models discovering and chaining their own zero days in a couple years. I'm not sure what else "takeoff" could possibly look like? | ||
| ▲ | bigyabai an hour ago | parent [-] | |
GLM has an extremely cheap subscription plan similar to Claude Code from Z.ai. You get Opus-level quotas with 5.2 and none of the Anthropic-style model nerfs when you ask cybersecurity questions. It's extraordinarily, preeminently accessible to anyone that wants to use it for ill or good. > We went from gpt 3 to models discovering and chaining their own zero days in a couple years. I'm not sure what else "takeoff" could possibly look like? GPT-3 can discover and chain their own zero days too, if the targeted software is vulnerable to enough low-hanging fruit. Exploit chains are not a reflection of intelligence, but more often a reflection of architectural oversights that can be tested with common exploits like XSS or bruteforcing. | ||