| ▲ | petcat 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Somewhat related to this same debate on censorship: French regulators order block of Polymarket's website [0] > The French gambling regulator said the site's continued availability constituted advertising. A ban on financial transactions to the site was already in place. After failing to compel Polymarket to geoblock France, it's crazy that French "regulators" can just order ISPs to block a website without any judicial review just because the mere existence of it on the internet constitutes "advertising" to French people. It seems like the EU in general is struggling badly with how to control internet access. Whether it's blocking VPNs, requiring access to private chats, or just blocking websites completely. [0] https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2026/07/17/france-b... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | spiderfarmer an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don’t think it’s crazy to enforce laws, especially given the leeway the government gave that predatory website. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||