But crucially:

> However, the court did not reverse its holding in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition as to virtual child pornography which is not obscene under the Miller standard

▲

Exoristos 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> virtual child pornography which is not obscene

Does it surprise anyone else that this is a legal possibility?

	▲	rootusrootus 8 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I get a little twitchy anytime we have laws based on something like obscenity, which is by definition a moral judgement.