| ▲ | GodelNumbering 4 hours ago |
| > so you end up having to write and maintain complex rulesets about what specific resources agents have access to. Why wouldn't you simply use the group chat ID (+more) to key the conversations on? |
|
| ▲ | paxys 3 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Because there’s an unlimited number of groups with different combinations of memberships. If I am in group A but not group B and an agent is in both, what is it allowed to share with me? |
| |
| ▲ | ahf8Aithaex7Nai 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'd like to see this problem solved in such a way that your group memberships are transitively applied to your access to agents. In other words: you shouldn’t be allowed to talk to an agent at all if, at a given point in time, that agent is or was in a group that you are not or were not in at that time. Does that make sense? I don’t know how practical this restriction is, but letting the AI manage such permissions on its own seems reckless to me. | | |
| ▲ | paxys 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | These kinds of rules never survive real world tests. For example if I create a private group just for myself and auto invite every agent in the company into it, does that mean no one can now use any of them? |
|
|
