> Because that's exactly what his job was for the previous 5 years...

Or possibly senior leadership isn’t happy with the pace of DC buildout over the last 5-years.

Very unlikely to be the technical build team at fault for that.

Real estate, legal, permitting, utility connections, construction, plant fit out, testing and certification, security, customs and immigration, and shipping all need to happen first - and every one of those has room for huge amounts of uncertainty and delay, more so if you're doing it internationally.

There aren't many shortcuts that you can take when you're dealing with a complex combination of hardware, property, and law.

▲

fidotron 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Technical staff are easiest to pin the blame on in any given situation. All those other fields require enormously more people skills and political inclination.

If you are in an org like that and there is an effort to pin something on technical people inappropriately the reaction when there's solid push back approaches total hysterical breakdown since it's so unexpected. Even if the tech staff "win" they'll be marked for the rest of their time there.

▲

lokar 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That matches my experience at google. Getting the land and approvals was the most time, then the basic site prep and building shells and utilities, then basic building fit out, and then finally the actual tech installs.

	▲	roryirvine 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah - and that's if everything goes to plan! The real way to increase throughput is to first slow down and smooth out the inevitable bumps by adding adequate slack and building up an inventory of shovel-ready projects as a buffer - and then to start running multiple teams in parallel. The fact that OP's friend experienced Oracle doing the exact opposite of this lends credence to the idea that they're under pressure and are perhaps panicking.

▲

saghm 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well I guess we can assume that this means it's not the reason senior leadership laid them off because senior leaders definitely never scapegoat their underlings or have too little competence to correctly assess why things failed!

▲

VirusNewbie 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

yes but sometimes a VP gets fired, new VP comes in, and says "we'll outsource this" or "we'll use this home grown team doing something else" and unfortunately tons of people are caught in a layoff, even if they were good.