| ▲ | Valodim 6 hours ago |
| You say that as if it wasn't true for anything human programmers ever produced |
|
| ▲ | encyclopedism 5 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Because Claude isn't a human the perception of it is different. Humans can fly planes, computers too can fly planes. I'm not going to give the same leeway to a 'computer' flying a plane that I would to a human. Because we understand that humans are just that, humans. The demands placed on a computer are so very different. |
| |
| ▲ | keleftheriou 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | What about driving a car? Computers are already driving cars autonomously, possibly better than the average human already, and quite plausibly will eventually be better than the best human driver. | | |
| ▲ | encyclopedism 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Precisely my point. Say for examples planes, trains or automobiles, humans may make way more errors than a computer does but you can bet your bottom dollar the threshold for allowing computers to autonomously control the above is way higher. Because the expectation is that if it is a computer it ought do it far better/safer. |
|
|
