| ▲ | onetimeusename 4 hours ago | |
I don't think per capita emissions is the only metric that should be used. Environmental impact is not measured per capita. Also it blames people in the US for energy consumed here to manufacture which includes exports for people abroad. The US's per capita emissions are not even far away from other similar nations. It's a data point, sure. It's comparable to Canada and Australia and even South Korea. Where did you get that the US emits 45x the UK? Another point is there is evidence[1] China has cheated and manipulated their data[2]. I don't like this "who are the good guys" game. Anyone playing this game is just looking to create a narrative about good and bad guys. [1]: https://www.spglobal.com/energy/en/news-research/latest-news... [2]: https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-chinas-new-carbon-metri... | ||