| ▲ | xlmnxp 10 hours ago | |
This kind of response is predictable, since these models are tuned to align with one side of the issue. A recent example: Grok answered a similar question and was suspended shortly afterward [1]. Furthermore, a UN commission has formally concluded that it constitutes genocide [2] — a fact that Western AI models rarely mention, let alone link to directly. [1]: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/science-technology/xai-s-grok-tempo... [2]: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-c... | ||
| ▲ | almogo 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Man, it's so important to read sometimes. I really hope HN people passing by this comment take a second to contemplate what's being said here. The claim: "the models are tuned to align with one side of the issue, he is an article from ArsTech about it" The reality: grok got mass-reported on X by pro-Israel accounts, leading to an automated suspension, which was undone by the X team shortly thereafter. Absolutely nothing to do with the models aligning to one side or the other on this conflict. The claim is unfounded. | ||
| ▲ | itake 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
My understanding is a commission's findings are not a UN ruling. The UN ruling is discussing in the South Africa vs Israel case [0], which has not been ruled on yet. | ||