Lots of software licenses have “non-compete” clauses that forbid you from using it to develop a competing product. Wouldn’t surprise me if there was a compiler or two out there with that restriction, most likely niche languages.

▲

inigyou 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Oracle database has a clause forbidding anyone to publish benchmarks of it.

▲

matheusmoreira 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Those clauses should be illegal.

▲

not2b 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's been common in electronic design automation tools to have license terms like that (forbidding use to create a competing product). However, competing companies have often found workarounds, either by finding loopholes or just breaking rules and hoping not to get caught.

▲

wolpoli 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If a person were to receive data from someone subjected to such restriction, is the receiver bounded by the same restriction?

▲

kiicia 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

balmer told us that gpl is cancer, but true cancer is us model of licensing

▲

scotty79 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

How the hell is non-compete legal in market economy? Competition is one of its core strengths. Why would anyone let anyone opt out of this, even a little bit?

▲

thesmtsolver2 14 hours ago | parent [-]

No country in the world is full free market economy. It is always a spectrum.

We are discussing Chinese models. Now look at how much foreign competition the Chinese government prevents in their domestic market in other industries.

	▲	scotty79 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Chinese companies compete ruthlessly between themselves though. That's how they get this good. Full competition with preventing exploitation by foreign countries seems to be working great for them. American and European protectionism of local rent-seekers can't really compete with that.