| ▲ | tombert 18 hours ago | |||||||
I mean, fair enough I guess. I've accidentally more-or-less reinvented interpreters on two separate occasions (both times using JSON as a quasi-AST), so I understand it. I guess I just feel like if you feel like you need programming constructs in your configuration, its approaching it from the wrong angle, and it should instead be handled via plugins. I feel like configuration itself should be a "dumb" format like JSON, and when you want to do anything that can't be accomplished by plain JSON, you should allow for easy development of plugins. | ||||||||
| ▲ | ffaccount2 15 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
>and when you want to do anything that can't be accomplished by plain JSON Like comments? ;) | ||||||||
| ||||||||